The answer to that is c.
Have a nice day
The correct answer is the second option
Answer:
Explanation:
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824), was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.
Answer:
<em>The purpose of a debate during the federal legislate process is for all parties involved to bring forward their cases and their reasons for either opposing or defending a new bill.</em>
Explanation:
The American democratic system ensures that people can influence a bill through their chosen representatives.
Hence, before a new bill is passed and turned into a Federal law, senators are given a chance to discuss the merits of the proposed bill
Since, all representatives have to vote on passing a bill, this gives a chance for all kinds of debates and points of views to be heard. It is possible that with a constructive discussion and criticisms, the bill can be amended to ensure something that can be accepted by the majority.
Answer:
under the Articles of Confederation, Congress could regulate the army, but could not compel the states to send troops. In other words, it could not really raise troops.
As for taxation, under said articles, Congress had no power whatsoevar to tax the states. It could only earn revenue by asking the states for money.
If policemen had as much power as Congress under the Articles of Confederation, then, the police would practically be powerless. I would have to look for funding through private donations, because it would not be entitled to any tax money.
Police would also probably be understaffed, so it would have to rely on voluntaries and people who have a passion for law enforcement.
