In this article, Li and Gleitman are questioning the implications of the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis.
The hypothesis argues (based on linguistic studies of Mayan populations) that the language of a society determines the members’ spatial reasoning, or the way they think about locations and distances. The Mayans use a spatial-coordinate system (ex. “to the north”) as opposed to a viewer-perspective system (ex. “to the left”).
Li and Gleitman question the findings, and they devise a research that involves only English speakers, but where they manipulate landmark cues. While they do not claim to have proven the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis wrong, they argue that the availability of landmark cues plays a larger role in spatial reasoning than the linguistic system itself.
For Athens,If a child had any imperfection they were often killed or abandoned, sometimes abandoned infants were taken in or adopted by a wealthy family, but most of the time they became a slave of the adoptive family.<span />
They are more likely to have social career personality.
People with Social career personality usually really interested in a type of jobs that adding value or bringing happiness to other people.
In general, people with this type of personality usually stucked up in the service industry or non-profit organization.
