Answer:
Perceptual defense
Explanation:
The perceptual defense is a process by which a catalyst alarming offensive and disagreeable are either not perceived or per-verted in perception especially when presented as brief flame. It is a non-recognition threatening stimuli. A stimulus may register outside of the awareness and bring about a change in response
There are two conditions must be there
1) The stimulus must be relevant
2) It must be maintained over time.
Answer:
Those experts are called <u>White Hat Hackers</u>
Explanation:
<em>White hat hackers </em>are those whose hacking activities are for a noble cause. They are also known as <em>ethical hackers</em>. Their primary motivation is usually not for personal or financial gain.
Also, they cannot be involved in cyber espionage, system hacking without the permission of the system owner.
They could be <em>paid employees or contractors working for companies as security specialists that attempt to find security holes via hacking.</em>
Answer:
What we can infer from these sentence from the story is:
D. The volunteers planned to connect the refrigerators to a source of electricity.
Explanation:
We can choose the correct option via elimination, after reading the passage. At no point does the passage say anything that would lead us to think the cords and fridges would be used as weapons. Letter A is, thus, eliminated. It also does not mention the amount of time necessary to install all the 60 fridges. We can also eliminate letter B for that reason. Letter C is also wrong, since the lines do not provide us with information about fridges being broken. It is likely some were, but not because we can infer it from the passage.
<u>Letter D is the only correct option. We can infer the volunteers were planning on plugging the fridges to an outlet. Why? Because they were carrying extension cords. That was the whole purpose of carrying them. Otherwise, the fridges wouldn't work. Therefore, we can safely choose letter D.</u>