Answer:
b) inhabit industrial development.
Explanation:
Just after the one month, Lincoln came to the office of the President of the United States, he was facing the problem of secession, which would divide the country. While the Confederacy claimed that secession is their constitutional right, Lincoln refute these claims. He said that it is a fight for democracy and U.S is the only country in the world which profess democracy and any threat to its unity would be seen as a threat to the institution of democracy in the world.
He feared all the options mentioned above except 'b) inhabit industrial development'.
It’s estimated that there’s over 25,000 miles
United Kingdom, Portugal, Kingdom of Sweden
Explanation:
- Almost all of Europe, except Great Britain and Sweden, were either under Napoleon's control or in a forced alliance.
- Most German countries were united within the Rhineland, the Netherlands and the Kingdom of Italy came under direct French control, and Spain became a dependent state.
- Austria, Russia and the almost unimportant Prussia became forced allies of France.
- Only the United Kingdom and the still unconquered parts of Spain and Portugal remained active opponents.
Learn more on Napoleon on
brainly.com/question/1305707
brainly.com/question/277050
brainly.com/question/2895638
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its concern is mentioned.
Explanation:
- Through me, the demand for amounts of unhealthy food seems to be inelastic in terms of costs. I acknowledge that as the cost goes up, consumers will consume less junk food, but perhaps the decrease in the supply is lower than that of the rising rise. It might be because, already though, substitutes for junk foods, particularly across the Us, are challenging to find. Unhealthy food is just the shortest and simplest meal to consume.
- The reasoning here seems to be that every customer would have to purchase food even though the price rises by 1%, so consumption will still decrease by somewhere around 1%. So perhaps we can assume that quality does not influence quantities throughout the Junk Food industry.
- The reduction of excess baggage would be small since it is inelastic. This symbolizes the corporation's low incompetence and as the cost is changed, the market for quantities is approximately the same, not so much impact.
- I thought taxing junk foods, especially to maximize welfare spending, is a smart option. But obesity over here Is not going to help. The incorrect method for combating obesity as well as making our diets balanced is taxes. The irony is that all clients are impacted by taxes regardless of their weight status. The impact of food taxes is unclear and may result in the replacement of items that may comprise of calories that seem to be equivalent or higher.
<span>The Constitution equally favors agriculture, commerce, and manufacturing.</span>
