The legislative branch of the Republic of Rome had two assemblies unlike the legislative branch of the United States which has a Senate and a House of Representatives.
<h3>What is the legislative branch?</h3>
The legislative branch is a term to refer to one of the three branches of public power that democratic governments have. The legislative branch has the function of creating the laws that will regulate life in a State.
<h3>What is the legislative branch of the United States made up of?</h3>
The legislative branch of the United States of America is made up of the Senate and the House of Representatives. All these positions are elected by citizen vote, so they can be classified as part of a representative democracy.
<h3 /><h3>How is the legislative branch of the Republic of Rome different from the legislative branch of the United States?</h3>
The legislative branch of the Republic of Rome differs from the legislative branch of the United States because it was made up of three institutions that were a Senate and two Assemblies, while that of the United States is made up of a Senate and a House of representatives.
Additionally, the chamber of the Republic of Rome had seats for members of the aristocracy but also had seats for other types of citizens in the assemblies. On the other hand, the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States have two institutions that are made up of officials elected by the citizens.
Learn more about Republic of Rome in: brainly.com/question/522590
#SPJ1
The correct answer is A. Congress
Although, later throughout history, the president was given the power to initiate wars in cases where it has to be done swiftly without having time to speak to the congress.
Explanation/Answer:
In the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries there were several new islamic dynasties the Ottoman, the Safavid, & the Mughal. With diferrent challenges however the main problem was the invasion by the Mongol Empire and death by the black plague. Others problem were the lack of stable political systems, a problem that was handled differently by each group Otomans and Mughals being more tolerant to diversity of language and religion while Safavid were really intolerant and singleminded. Despite the differences their political styles were very similar since all established their legitimacy through military prowess, religious backing, & a loyal bureaucracy.
Khosrau I was a 20th king of kings of Sassanid Empire. As a king, he centralized the government of Sassanid Empire. He was the one who established a tax reform. He also started military reforms during his time. Sassanid empire in his leadership was expanded. He built strong walls to prevent conquerors to raid.