Answer:
$294,412.8
Explanation:
In order to obtain a seat on the board of directors, Raul must hold more than 50 percent of the total number of outstanding shares if there are three open seats and straight voting occurs.
Total number of shares required = (46,000 ÷ 2) + 1
= 23000 + 1
= 23,001 shares
Market price of share = $ 12.80
Total amount = Total number of shares required × Market price of share
= 23,001 × $ 12.80
= $294,412.8
The amount Raul wants to invest on obtaining a seat on board of directors is $294,412.8
Answer:
the average amount of money is 1,165
Explanation:
The computation of the average amount of money i.e. earned by each theater is shown below:
= Total number of tickets sold ÷ number of theaters
where,
The Total number of tickets sold is 879,575
And, the number of theaters is 755
Now place these values to the above formula
So, the average amount of money is
= $879,575 ÷ 755
= 1,165
hence, the average amount of money is 1,165
Explanation:
1. The ceterus paribus effect gives us to what extent, the effect of a variable has on another variable, while holding all other factors fixed. Analysing job training of workers on productivity will give us results that are not biased since we will not be taking account of other factor variables in the calculations. When 2 firms are the same in almost every aspect apart from number of hours on training, then we will find out that each firm would have different levels of workers output. So we should know if workers output increases due to job training.
2. When it comes to provision of training, furms do these based on characteristics of the workers. Some of these characteristics are measurable while some are immeasurable
Measurable:
Experience on the job,
Productivity
Level of education,
immeasurable :
Skill set
Vision
Likeliness to bstay at firm
3. Apart from worker characteristics, productivity also depends on other factors one of which is technological change. A technological change can bring about increased efficiency and greater output by the worker. Different firms using different capital and technological combination are quite likely to have different output levels.
4. A positive correlation between job training and productivity cannot be used to ascertain if job training makes worker more efficient this is due to the fact that correlation only tells us if variables are in coexistence. So a positive correlation does not tell us that job training is indeed bringing about changes in the productivity of workers.
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
1) Marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for this economy is 0.75 as it denotes the spending of the household and saving of 0.25 and the spending multiplier for this economy is
= Spending Multiplier(M)
= 1 ÷ 1 - MPC
= 1 ÷ 1-0.75
= 1 ÷ 0.25
= 4
2). Decrease in government purchases will lead to a decrease in income, generating an initial change in consumption
= -Amount of Government Decrease Purchases by × MPC
= -$250 billion × 0.75
= -$187.5 billion
3). Decrease income again, causing a second change in consumption
= Amount Decrease in Government Purchases × MPC
= -$187.5 billion × 0.75
= $140.6 billion
4).Total change in demand resulting from the initial change in government spending
= Amount of Government Decrease Purchases by × Spending Multiplier(M)
= $250 × 4
= $1,000 billion
= $1 trillion
As we can see that the income falls by $1000 billion in the end, so AD shifts to the left by the size of $1 trillion
In the question the graph is missing. Kindly find the attachment for both of question and answer
Answer:
Kindly see attached organized table for clarity.
Item cash Net income
a Purchase of Supplies of cash -$133 -
b Adjusting entry for use of supplies - -$31
c Made sales on account - $1,297
d Received cash from customer on acct $865 -
e Purchased equipment for cash -$2,528 -
f Depreciation of building to be recorded - -$610