Answer:
Is the benefit worth the cost?
Explanation:
Environmental policies application has to lead to some economic cost.
When coming up with this policies, the effect that this policies shall have towards environmental protection shall be considered.
The cost and economic effect that this policies shall cause should also be looked at.
If a policy causes insignificant change towards environmental protection and at the same time the costs are too high, then the policy should be dropped.
If a policy has got significant impact and costs less, the it should be taken.
<span>The correct answer is b. Option a is incorrect because these models can demonstrate scientific theories, but they don't prove scientific theories (you would need experiments for that). Option c is incorrect because the models aren't always representing something abstract (i.e. DNA is very real, just very small). Option d is incorrect because they don't precisely mimic something in nature, but instead help us visualize something in nature that is difficult to see or comprehend.</span>
<span>They can rais the number of crops produced in an amount of time, they can also reduce the need for harmful pesticides. However, they may cause more allergies in humans, producing a health risk.</span>
I’m pretty sure it’s d hope that helped
<span>An environmental factor that causes a population to decrease is death</span>