This is known as the coattail effect. It is when the actions or activities of the main branch of a business or the franchise branches would impact the whole business. This is one weakness of a franchise business. since one wrong move from just one small branch would might have a larger impact on the whole name of business.<span />
Answer:
$326,622.73
Explanation:
Calculation to determine How much will you have in your account if you make deposits for 20 years
Using this formula
Future value = Annuity × {( 1 + interest rate) ^ time period - 1} ÷ interest rate
Future value = $5,900 × {( 1 + 0.097 ^ 20 years - 1} ÷ 0.097
Future value= $5,900 × 55.3597842916
Future value= $326,622.73
Therefore the amount you will have in your account if you make deposits for 20 years is $326,622.73
Answer:
False
Explanation:
1) In Japan, this is rude to openly tip waiters, waitress, etc. So to avoid squabbles over tipping some restaurants ask politely if they may charge a fee of 15% on coupons. But it is not expected, nor it is mandatory to have this rule. It is humiliating, disgusting for somebody to ask or wait for tips.
Tips are not seen as an incentive to better work in Japan.
2) Tips in Europe is way too modest, than in the US. In some countries it is not even expected, but the tips range within 5% to 10% when it is necessary.
3) Kellyanne is wrong in both pieces of information
Answer:
Hornberger plows back 22.72% of its earnings into the firm.
Explanation:
Plowback ratio fundamental analysis ratio that measures how much earnings are retained after dividends are paid out.
We can use the relationship g = ROE × b to find the plowback ratio (b).
The growth rate implied by the recent dividend and the expected dividend is estimated using the equation, D1 = D0 × (1 + g)
$2.05 = $2.00 × (1 + g)
$2.05 - 2.00 = 2.00g
0.05 / 2 = g
g = 2.5%
Then according to the equation (b)
2.50% = 11.00% × b
b = 2.50%/11.00%
b = 22.72%
Answer:
e. the expected return on a security is positively and linearly related to the security's beta.
Explanation:
As per CAPM: Expected return (ER) = Rf + \beta (Rm - Rf)
Lets assume risk free return (Rf) as 5%, \beta as 2 and expected market return (Rm) as 10%
then, ER = 5% + 2 (10% - 5%) = 15%
However if lets assume all the other factors remain the same and \beta increases to 3
then, ER = 5% + 3 (10% - 5%) = 20%
Similarly if \beta reduces to 1
then, ER = 5% + 1 (10% - 5%) = 10%
So higher the \beta higher is the risk and hence higher the expected return. Hence expected return on a security is positvely and linearly related to the security's beta
