The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
In a speech given on March 5, 1946, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill said an "iron curtain has descended across the continent". What was Churchill describing in his speech?
Former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill referred to the Berlin War that divided East Germany from West Germany.
Winston Churchill's "Iron Curtain speech" referred to the control and dominance the Soviet Union was exerting over some European countries, establishing what he called "an iron curtain that has descended across the continent."
Those were the satellite nations that teh Soviet Union controlled. The USSR considered them as a "buffer state" in the case western nations tried to invade the Soviet Union. We are talking about East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, and Albania.
Churchill delivered this speech on March 5, 1946, in a College in Fulton, Missouri, before US President Harry S. Truman. Both men expressed their concerns about the international scenario and USSR activities under the leadership of Joseph Stalin that wanted to spread Communism in different nations.
<span>President Andrew Jackson fought bravely against the Indians in numerous wars before becoming president in 1828. President Jackson was a strong opponent of Indian tribes. On May 28, 1830, President Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act. Congress passed the treaty in order to relocate the Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi River to lands in the west. Although, the act did not order the removal of the Indians, it did allow the president to negotiate land by exchanging treaties with tribes living within the boundaries of the states.</span>
Answer:
I would pick B because you move away from the area if it's hot and there's no water.
I don't think I'm much help sorry if this is wrong
Answer:
I would be a Federalist.
Explanation:
the main difference between the federalist and anti-federalists is on their opinion on how much power the central government should have over the states.
Federalist wanted the government to have more power and the anti-federalist wanted the government to have less power. In Hindsight, anti-federalists' idea sounds better. Since it will give the government less influence to disrupt the people.
But considering the issues that they faced at the time, I believe more government power was necessary.
The earlier draft of the constitution did not provide the central government with crucial power such as ability to collect taxes or create a centralized military. Both of those issues were supported by the Federalist.
