Answer:
dawg no one is gonna do this for u u need to MAN UP. RIGHT NOW. DO IT.
Explanation:
Answer:
that his First Amendment rights were being violated
Explanation:
Gitlow v. New York was a case that was ruled by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 8, 1925 and stated that the First Amendment of the United States Constitution "Protection of Free Speech" also applied to state governments also. According to Gitlow, his article did not precipitate any violent action, but he was yet convicted, which he felt was a violation of his rights to freedom of speech as stated in the First Amendment.
Answer:
They called them Al-Andalus and also Moors.
Explanation:
Answer: Criticizing the current president is fully protected speech and Jerome cannot be prosecuted.
Explanation:
The right to the freedom of speech is a clause in the First Amendment which prevents the restriction of the press or free speech. By wearing a t-shirt with a message that says the president is doing a bad job, Jerome is expressing his opinion and this is within his right to speak freely.
The benefits of free speech include allowing citizens to vent their frustrations instead of resorting to violence and citizen inclusion in decision making processes such as elections
.
Answer:
Correct answer is what life was like for a crusader making the journey to Jerusalem.
Explanation:
First option is not correct as we are not sure who is the author of the text and we cannot established its reliability.
Second option is also not correct because we don't have information whether something has changed in the economical life of the continent.
Third option is also not correct as it doesn't describe the life of ordinary people.
Fourth option is correct as we can conclude that the journey was rough and although Crusaders lacked resources there was a divine power that was leading them.
