With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,
- The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
- Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>
Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.
As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.
Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.
Learn more about social discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/13964317
#SPJ1
<h2>✏Answer ✏</h2>
<em> 48 hours</em><em>.</em>
Explanation:
Reports must be confirmed in writing to the local investigation unit within 48 hours of the Hotline call.
<em>#</em><em> </em><em>Brainliest Bunch</em><em> </em>
Answer:
no
Explanation:
just because we have language barrier doesn't mean we have view someone differently
♡︎ howdy!! ♡︎
your answer is ➪ overstatement!
goodluck on edge!! :)
Hello! Backward is best. If ever a accident you’d have less chance of hurting yourself with the airbag, or even hitting your head on the windshield. Always check where all your airbags are so your keeping you and your family safe while driving! Good luck hopefully this helps;)