Answer:
A
Explanation:
It allows laws to be inconsistent from state to state.
Answer:
This statement is incorrect, since the theory has enormous relevance in law.
Explanation:
The law is basically a set of norms that regulates life in society, establishing guidelines for coexistence and rules of conduct that, if not complied with, have consequences that can range from simple fines to time in prison.
But unlike what the statement says, the law is composed of a theoretical component, which implies the sociological and cultural study of the law and the society to which it will apply, the consequences that it may have and its use in other societies. Without this study, the laws would be empty of content, since they would be simple rules without any basis and, therefore, very easy to be broken.
Answer:
put this in English
Explanation:
I'm about to Saputo. Ca va Chewbacca, but she's not.
Answer:
review laws, explain laws and then decides if the laws in question go against the constitution
Explanation:
The different benches in the parliament show the ruling of the ministers sitting on those benches.
Answer: Option 1.
<u>Explanation:</u>
There are different benches in the parliament. Different benches show different rulings. The benches which are in the front row are for the ministers which are important and have high rankings in the parliament. The ministers and the shadow ministers sit in the front row of the parliament.
The people who are not even the ministers or the shadow ministers sit in the back benches of the parliament or in the rows behind the rows of the front benches. A person who sits on the cross bench is the one from the independent or the minor party member.
