The civil war wasn't self defense, it was a war over the issue of slavery and the rights of the states, so I'd eliminate B. The south actually had the superior military leaders, the North was struggling with that part, so it's not C either. And D isn't an advantage, it's just a stand view, so that leaves the answer to be <span>A. The north had more natural resources. </span>
<span>- to produce more of certain goods and services in a more efficient way
- to trade with one another for goods or services they cannot provide on their own
- to produce more goods and services, and to contribute to greater global prosperity
In regard to goods or services a country cannot provide on its own, it may also simply be that it cannot provide those goods or services with the same degree of efficiency or quality as can another country. This is the idea of comparative advantage, where each country focuses on producing those things in which it has an advantage over others and then trade with others for the other goods or services it desires. On the global scale, this does increase productivity and prosperity overall.
</span>
Carolina turns into a place for aristocratic whites and many dark slaves as a result of some cheerful children of English landed families denied of a legacy went to the region and slaves required for rice ranches.
King Charles II guaranteed the Lord Proprietors expansive homes and manors in the New World. The province of Carolina was home to a significant number of the first pilgrims who went there from Barbados, carrying their slave framework with them. Because of the African information of rice development, many slaves were transported in to explore different avenues regarding the item. The African slaves were almost insusceptible to intestinal sickness, so they made up the vast majority of the populace, working in the fields while the white gentry led lives of extravagance.
Answer: While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for enslaved labor to grow and pick the cotton. In fact, the opposite occurred. Cotton growing became so profitable for enslavers that it greatly increased their demand for both land and enslaved labor.
Explanation:
Answer:
It set a limit on the total amount of crops farmers could sell in a year
Explanation:
The Agricultural Adjustment Administration provided relief for farmers under FDR’s New Deal by setting a limit on the total amount of crops that farmers could sell in a year.
This was done in a bid to protect the farmers and their produce from having an export deficit.
