It is first important to understand that not all Republicans rejected a peace settlement with the Confederates during or after the Civil War, but it was a smaller group within the party that totally and completely refused and demanded a full surrender without conditions to the South. This group was called the Radical Republicans and they began around 1854 and went until after the Reconstruction of 1877. They were the ones who were responsible for the establishment of the Fourteenth Ammendment and they radically opposed any negotiations with the South on the basis of their being totally against segregation and slavery. Some other factions within the Republican party, including Lincoln, were more moderate and were willing to give in to some of the demands from the Confederates, especially ont he issue of slaves.
The reason for these radical Republicans not wanting to negotiate with the Southern Confederates, was that they refused to allow slavery to continue. They were pushing for all slaves in the U.S to be freed, for segregation to be prohibited, for rights for black people to be established in the United States and even went as far as pushing for civil rights, including suffrage, for African Americans. But the South, of course, refused these terms. This is why neither Radical Republicans, nor Confederate members would have been able to settle anything in a negotiation. There was no common ground for the toughest issue of all; slavery.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, an Incan would have described this achievement as “clever” because he/she wouldn't have thought that such limited land would produce so many corns. The fact that only a small portion of the land could grow corns was hampering the food supply of the Incan people.
When irrigation channels were constructed on the demands of the king, land became more fertile and the production of corns increased rapidly. This was truly a clever achievement for the Incas who had limited fertile land to grow corns.
World War also started after archduke Francis Ferdinand got assassinated.
Colonists knew the land, and used suprised tactics much like the Vietcong in Vietnam. Colonists were also fighting for their freedom, while British soldiers were fighting because it was their job. British soldiers also had to travel across the sea to be deployed, whereas colonists didn’t have to move.
• european explorers hoped to find riches in distant countries and discover a sea route to Asia
• europeans hoped to spread christianity to people throughout the world and drive Muslims out of other lands
• Europeans began to build stronger,faster ships and other technology making trips easier
• theres other reasons but those are the main three
