1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Westkost [7]
3 years ago
11

Popular sovereignty was a policy stating that A. voters in a state should decide whether or not to stay in the union. B. voters

in a territory should decide whether or not to allow slavery in that territory. C. Congress should decide whether or not to allow slavery in a territory. D. voters in a territory should decide whether or not to join the union.
History
1 answer:
nasty-shy [4]3 years ago
6 0
<span>Hello! Popular Sovereignty was a policy that stated that the power to decide about the slavery question was concentred in the hands of the states, and not in the Congress rulers. So, in that way, the answer is b) voters in a territory should decide whether or not to allow slavery in that territory.</span>
You might be interested in
Icons representing historical figures had specific attributes, so that they could be recognized
Dahasolnce [82]
The answer is true .....
4 0
3 years ago
Chapter 9 sections 2 &amp; 3​
andreev551 [17]

I don’t see a question

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Now that you have gone over both readings, write a short paragraph in which you compare the two. How are they alike? For US Hist
dlinn [17]

Answer:

Both dealt with the hardship of slavery.

Both talked about ways that enslaved people could resist.

Both speak out against the Fugitive Slave Act.

Explanation:

This was on edge

7 0
3 years ago
If a President receives a bill that has some provisions he or she supports and some provisions he or she opposes, the President
Viefleur [7K]

I think is D

Explanation:

bc the Pres. has the power to veto or sign and I think he can also ask to make changes

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does Madison say it is possible to have tyranny in a democracy? Explain.
zubka84 [21]

Answer: No.

Explanation:

In the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In ancient Egypt, they realized that some illnesses were the result of a specific occurrence or action. Which actions or occurre
    14·2 answers
  • Who believed the exodus showed gods power ?
    7·2 answers
  • Who would have supported malcolm x booker t washington vs marcus garvey?
    6·1 answer
  • PLZ Help Asap <br><br> In three to four sentences explain the relationship between Israel and HAMAS.
    5·1 answer
  • What was the name of the B-29 bomber that dropped the first atomic bomb?
    7·2 answers
  • Which was NOT a reason to target Japan as a new market?
    11·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt about a Viking invasion in England. As [the Vikings] were going to their ships, the English army should have c
    15·2 answers
  • A list of complaints proposed fixes
    5·1 answer
  • How was the united states viewed by the world as a result of the spanish-american war?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement summarizes the Enslaved Persons Clause?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!