Answer:
No
Explanation:
The independent irrelevant alternative criterion is not violated here. The law of irrelevant alternative criterion holds that if candidate A is liked more than candidate B then a new candidate C who is liked less than candidate A should not spoil the victory of Candidate A, so that candidate B wins.
In the example in the question, candidate Parker was the preferred candidate before the elimination of candidate Myers and so will still be the winner of the election, therefore the irrelevant alternative criterion has not been violated.
Answer:
725,000
Step-by-step explanation:
The number to the right of 5 is 3, it's lower than five so your thousand is going to stay the same number. If your hundreds place is greater than 5, then it would be rounded to 726,000.
Answer:
4(x+3) = 25
Step-by-step explanation:
4x + 12 = 25
4x = 13
x = 3.25
