The primary source of law the supreme court would interpret to determine if the executive order was enforceable would be the constitution.
A constitution is a collection of guiding ideas or accepted precedents that serve as the foundation for a polity, organisation, or other sort of body's legal system and frequently specify how that institution is to be governed.
A written constitution is said to be one that contains these principles in a single legal document or group of legal papers; a codified constitution is one that contains all of these principles in a single comprehensive document. A significant example of an uncodified constitution is the United Kingdom's constitution, which is instead contained in various basic Acts of a legislature, legal decisions, or treaties.
Learn more about constitution here:
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
Answer:
Rembrandt's pieces characterized by human qualities and intense color.
Explanation:
Answer: Less important than later experiences
The weave lane is the lane that used for both entering and exiting a highway.
<h3>What is a
weave lane?</h3>
It refers to a freeway / expressway lane that acts as both an entrance and an exit lane for the driver.
On the weave lane, the driver must drive carefully because vehicles share the same lane to exit and enter the expressway
Hence, the weave lane is the lane that used for both entering and exiting a highway.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about weave lane
brainly.com/question/16890944
#SPJ1
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
