Answer:
B) did not file the complaint within 45 days of the event.
Explanation:
Time limits matter and in this case Catherine should have approached the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission before.
All she can do now is wait until next April and if her work is not properly recognized at that moment, then she should immediately file a complaint (at least before the 45 day limit expires).
Answer:
The correct answer would be option C, When the price of a good decreases, sellers produce less of the good.
Explanation:
According to the law of supply, when the price of the product increases, the quantity supplied also increases.
This theory suggests that there is a direct relationship between the price of the product and the quantity supplied of the product. So when the price of a good decreases, sellers produce less of the good.
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.
Answer:
None of the option is correct.
Explanation:
Principle of comparative advantage states that a country has a comparative advantage in producing a certain goods if the opportunity cost of producing those goods is lower than the other country. A country is exporting a commodity in which it has a comparative advantage and importing a commodity in which it has a comparative disadvantage.
