<span>To find the compound interest of an investment you have to use this formula, A = P(1 + r/n)^nt, where A is the total amount you have after the investment period, P is the amount you invest or the amount you put in, r is the rate of the of the compound interest in this case 10%, n is the amount of time the interest will be compounded for example, 4 months a year(quarterly) or 6 months a year(semi annually), and t is the amount of time you invest in years.
So in this case you are going to substitute everything in the formula with their given value. So P = $700, r = 10%, n = 21 (because it is the number of months we invest for), and t = 2 years (because 21 months fit perfectly in 2 years, and t must always be in years). The resulting formula will be A = $700(1 + 0.1/21)^(21 x 2), which will give you an answer of $855 rounded to the nearest dollar.</span>
Answer:
1. T=19.5n+91.75, where n<70
2. T=15n+45, where n≥70
Explanation:
1. The first linear function can be expressed as;
Total cost of catering services=(Cost per person×number of people, n)+Service charge
where;
Total cost of catering services=T
Cost per person=$19.50
Number of people=n
Service charge=$91.75
Replacing;
T=(19.5×n)+91.75
T=19.5n+91.75
The first equation: T=19.5n+91.75, where n<70
2. The second linear function can be expressed as;
Total cost of catering services=(Cost per person×number of people, n)+Service charge
where;
Total cost of catering services=T
Cost per person=$15
Number of people=n
Service charge=$45
Replacing;
T=(15×n)+45
T=15n+45
The second equation: T=15n+45, where n≥70
Answer:
A. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale
Explanation:
The behaviorally anchored rating scales, called BARS for short, indicates both qualitative and quantitative data to the employees appraisal process. BARS uses behavioural movements as reference rather than using the traditional generic descriptors. It identifies critical behaviours of a large group, classify these behaviors into performance dimensions and then rank these behaviors into levels of performance.
Answer:
Yes, there is a violation of the Equal Pay Act because Hank's salary ($14 per hour) is higher than Marjorie's ($12 per hour).
Explanation:
The Equal Pay Act of 1963 basically establishes that no employer can pay a higher salary to an employee of one sex and pay a lower salary to an employee of the opposite sex. Theoretically this law protects both women and men, since the provision doesn't establish a specific sex that is protected.
In this case, it is OK for Ellen to earn a higher salary than Hank because she has more experience and she was transferred to the New York facility. But Hank shouldn't earn a higher salary than Marjorie because she is a more experienced worker.
This law doesn't consider the differences between Ellen's salary and Marjorie's.
Answer:
Epsilon should make the product instead of buying it
Explanation:
Direct material = $8.4
Direct labor = $24.4
Overhead = $42
Relevant cost = $8.4 + $24.4 + ($42x70%)
Relevant cost = $8.4 + $24.4 +$29.4
Relevant cost = $62.2
Cost to make = $62.2
Cost to buy = $66.2
Difference = $4
Epsilon should make this product instead of buying it from another supplier
because the cost to make the product is much lower than buying it.
