Answer:
The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:
Law and economics school of thought.
Explanation:
The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws. This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices. This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.
Its a fundamental human right. It also underpins most other rights and allows them to flourish. The right to speak your mind freely on important issues in society, access information and hold the powers that be to account, plays a vital role in the healthy development process of any society.
Answer:
Explanation:
Which of the following statements concerning “SIPs” under the Clean Air Act is false? a.) After EPA sets a NAAQS, it is up to each state to decide how to achieve the standard b.) If a state uses “tall stacks” to attain a NAAQS, it does not receive credit for the gains achieved by that method c.) If a state uses “command and control” to attain a NAAQS, it does not receive credit for the gains achieved by that method d.) Regardless of pollution levels within a state, its SIP may be inadequate if the state contributes significantly to nonattainment in another state e.) In certain circumstances, EPA may reject a state’s proposed SIP as deficient, after which EPA may promulgate a federal implementation plan
Answer:
dude just search it up im sure its on Google, you dont have to ask it either im sure somebody asked it with and answer already
