Answer:
Top-down planning
Explanation:
Top-down planning -
It refers to the method planning , where the goals are bifurcated and placed according to the hierarchy from top to bottom , is referred to as top - down planning .
As breaking and arranging the goals , make the process to accomplish the goals in a better manner .
The process require the movement from higher level to lower level , in a very orderly manner to hasten the process .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is Top-down planning .
Answer: Option B
Explanation: In simple words, conflict of interest refers to a situation when a person have the power to make a certain decision from which he or she gets to have some special benefit.
Therefore, conflict of interest always results in the scope bias. As the individual in the power can use his or her position that can lead to benefit of him or loss of others or both.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B.
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
In simple words, Horizontal analysis ( also referred to as pattern analysis) is indeed a method for the study of financial records that indicates improvements in the sums of the related products over a span of time. This is a valuable tool for determining pattern circumstances. The reports are being used in horizontal analysis for two different time intervals and is compared on percentage basis.
Answer:
Multiplier effect in the 4th round = 3.58
Explanation:
A change in aggregate demand can create a much greater impact in the equilibrium national income. This is known as the multiplier effect. This occurs when injections of new demand for goods and services into the circular flow of income creates further rounds of spending. For example, if the government spending was on building new affordable houses then the need for housing materials will create demand for wood, cement and other housing supplies. Thus, these businesses will see a rise in sales. Whilst they benefit through profits, their employees would benefit from wages and salaries. As their income rises, they will spend it in the economy, and so will the businesses from their profits. This additional rounds of spending is the multiplier effect.
If a 100 increase creates 33 for the second round, it is 33% (33/100 x 100) i.e. 100 x 33% = 33
This is proven since 33 x 33% = 10.89 in the third round.
Hence, the multiplier effect in the forth round = 10.89 x 33% = 3.58
