For my second video, I decided to watch the "taco bells, Nacho Fries" They did a great marketing strategy. During the time Horror movies were a big trend but unfortunately, taco bell was selling food, not a movie. So they decided to make the first few seconds seem like it was a horror movie but while still have the nacho fries on the screen. Then they showed the nacho fries as the villain or horror. That made the viewer intrigued. Even if at that point they decide to skip the video, they won't forget it. Like I said earlier, horror movies were big at that time, so even if they wanted to forget it would be a challenge. Also because they continued watching means that they were interested in the commercial.
When watching Hulu I found this ad and fell in love with it. The song was so catchy that my brother and I sing it for fun. The actors portray amazing emotions that seem so natural. The Commercial I'm talking about is "Tag Team Helps With Dessert - GEICO Insurance" They make the commercial funny with different angles, a unique song, emotions, and even the little dances were entertaining to watch. The producers wanted to make something unique. Even though it could seem random it not tho. It makes it clear with a story and makes it unique with comedy.
2/5
Answer:
I don't understand this one
The gerund phrases are:
- "Being the accounts manager" (Subject)
- "blowing bubbles to his little sister" (Subjet Complement)
Gerund phrases begin with a gerund or -ing word, and include other modifiers and objects. They function as nouns, and can be the subject, subject complement or direct object of the sentence.
The rest of the alternatives are not gerund phrases because options one and three possess an infinitive verb ("to bring" and "to win"), and "Hiking for two hours" is a present participle clause.
Answer:
D. After she had been in a terrible accident, Lupita never again asked
to drive the car.
Explanation:
Alternative A cannot be correct because it does not form a complex sentence
Alternative B cannot be correct because the meaning is not retained. The two sentences have a connection of cause, which is not presented here.
Alternative C cannot be correct because, despite the meaning is correct, <em>she </em>and <em>Lupita </em>here denote two different persons, while they are supposed to be the same.
Alternative D carries all the required parameters and is the correct answers. The connection between the sentences is one of cause and effect, and <em>she </em>and <em>Lupita </em>refer to the same person.
B. would be the correct comparison because the others either use wrong term or double comparison like more better. Best would be superlative and used for comparing three or more things. Gooder is not a word. More better is double comparison.
