1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
satela [25.4K]
3 years ago
15

Which northern Renaissance novel comments about its times as it describes the comic adventures of two giants?

History
2 answers:
adelina 88 [10]3 years ago
7 0
The answer to your question is D. Gargantua and Pantagruel.
leonid [27]3 years ago
3 0

<u>Which northern Renaissance novel comments about its times as it describes the comic adventures of two giants?</u>

<em>D. Gargantua and Pantagruel</em>

Written by François Rabelais and first published in 1532, <em>"Gargantua and Pantagruel"  </em>are a series of five novels that explore the adventures of two giants (father and son) who journey with other companions and engage in comedic situations which are often representations of folk beliefs during Rabelais' times.

You might be interested in
How did urban sprawl affect people who did own cars?
adelina 88 [10]

The answer is: B) Cars made it convenient to commute between cities and suburbs

Urban sprawl refers to the process of people moving from highly populated area into a more populated area.

Many workers in the city decided to do this by buying a house in suburban area and commute to their workplace every day.

Cars are considered to be a popular option for the to commute. If they commute by train or bus, They're restricted to a certain schedule that might not be convenience to them. Using cars enable them to commute whenever and wherever they want.

7 0
2 years ago
. она анализ+ауерорпенр
Kruka [31]

Answer:

im sorry but i dont understand

5 0
3 years ago
The Supreme Court justices are more willing to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional than to strike down presidential action
stealth61 [152]
Laws passed through congress have a direct impact on the court system, since it changes the way courts have to rule on the law. The Supreme court allows the court system to have some say in what laws are just by appealing their agreement with the constitution. The President doesn't directly pass laws, he has the power to veto congressional laws and through his endorsement behind them, but doesn't actually have the power to write, create or pass new laws himself, even if he's the one who technically signs them into law. As such, the supreme court checks the president less often than congress, because the president's actions affect the court's sphere of interest less often. Most interaction between the president and the court happen when the President heavily endorses a bill, gets it passed through congress, and then the court checks it. Some great examples are the Agricultural Adjustment Administration and the National Recovery Administration, which were created through bills sponsored by Franklin Roosevelt as part of his New Deal reforms. The court struck them down as unconstitutional for various reasons, much to the dismay of FDR. In modern times, Obamacare almost had it's individual mandate requirement stuck down by the court a few years ago and elements of President Trump's muslim travel ban were struck down by the supreme court just in the last month.
8 0
3 years ago
In 1861, the so-called Trent affair Select one: a. saw the capture of Union diplomats by the Confederate government. b. created
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

b. created an international diplomatic crisis for Abraham Lincoln.

Explanation:

The Trent Affair was a diplomatic incident in 1861 during the American Civil War that threatened a war between the United States and the United Kingdom.

The crisis erupted after the captain of the U.S. San Jacinto ordered the arrest of two Confederate envoys sailing to Europe aboard a British mail ship, the Trent, in order to seek support for the South in the Civil War. The British, who had not taken sides in the war, were outraged and claimed the seizure of a neutral ship by the U.S. Navy was a violation of international law. In the end, President Abraham Lincoln’s administration released the envoys and averted an armed conflict with Britain.

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!! i will give you brainly!
never [62]
Meep Moop Meep Moop Meep
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not a benefit of drilling for oil and gas
    14·1 answer
  • What was Germany's most effective tactic against Great Britain's warships during World War I?
    11·2 answers
  • When Jesus called Matthew, His love reached out to the:
    5·1 answer
  • Help as quick as posible i will mark u as brainliest
    12·2 answers
  • Why were griots important to African societies?
    8·1 answer
  • When is it most useful to conduct an Internet search description?
    5·1 answer
  • What is it about the king's selling of the Wilks's slaves that most angers the townspeople?​
    10·1 answer
  • Under the feudal system, what was the role of peasants? *
    11·2 answers
  • Explain the Montgomery Bus Boycott.<br> I'll give Brainliest to the 1st person :)
    15·1 answer
  • How did chief joseph resist the governments attempts to move the Nez Perce to reservations
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!