1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Angelina_Jolie [31]
3 years ago
14

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!

History
1 answer:
Travka [436]3 years ago
4 0
You could have just ask nicely and not everyone could answer everyones questions cause there are ALOT of people to help answer
You might be interested in
Brainliest if you answer this correctly in DETAIL. More than 3 sentences long, please.
Annette [7]

Answer:

Disadvantages: Some primary sources, such as eyewitness accounts, may be too close to the subject, lacking a critical distance. Others, such as interviews, surveys, and experiments, are time consuming to prepare, administer, and analyze. Primary sources help students relate in a personal way to events of the past and promote a deeper understanding of history as a series of human events. Because primary sources are incomplete snippets of history, each one represents a mystery that students can only explore further by finding new pieces of evidence.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
If you hit a parked car and can’t find the owner , you should
UNO [17]
Run or be responsible and tell someone like someone next to you
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which were the major crops grown in the colonies that demanded slave labor?
sammy [17]

corn.tomatoes.tonacco lotatoes

5 0
3 years ago
Why was steel a more effective building material than iron in the late 1800s?
ExtremeBDS [4]
Before the 1800s, builders used cast iron. But they found that structural steel beams set in concrete allowed them to frame tall buildings that were more fire resistant and more structurally sound than cast iron. Since that time, steel has not only become the best building material for commercial construction but closely tied to economic health.
7 0
3 years ago
What would be the reactions of today's society if the Sons of Liberty had done the Boston Tea party now? Would everyone support
jolli1 [7]

Answer:

The ideas behind the Boston Tea Party can still be seen in politics today. The Sons of Liberty were angry about unfair government, so they protested through the destruction of government property. If, in modern day, the government was as unfair as it was during colonial times then these forms of protest would surely be popular. However, it is extremely unlikely that everyone would support it. Even back at the real Boston Tea Party a group called the loyalist did not support the Sons of Liberty. Similar groups would most likely form that would also disagree with a modern-day Boston Tea Party.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What tools do scientists use to date artifacts and fossils
    12·1 answer
  • What are the three goals of the employment act of 1946?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes why settlement houses offered to help immigrants learn to cook specific kinds of food?
    12·1 answer
  • The two main factors that influenced the development of humans were _____.
    14·2 answers
  • Which description accurately applies to Voltaire, Montesquieu, Diderot, and Condorcet?
    8·2 answers
  • Why is the Declaration of Independence considered
    15·1 answer
  • What change in social attitude did the flapper represent in 1920s america?
    6·1 answer
  • What goods were traded between Rome and China on the silk road
    8·2 answers
  • why might the executive director of the Sierra club have described the discion to remove endangered species protections for yell
    11·1 answer
  • My name is John doe?<br> True or False
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!