Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Attempt to have employee diversity that reflects the diversity of the membership.
Explanation:
Firms could take advantage of the diversity of their employees since the more different workers are the likelihood of having a greater pool of expertise increases. However, employers must make sure that equal opportunities are given to all of them and not to be biased over one group specifically which could lead to discriminatory treats.
Therefore,<em> if diversity is intended to be implemented in a given group, it should represent the different memberships the group has which implies talking about individuals of different economic statuses, cultures, ethnicity, nationalities, gender, and race, just to mention a few features.</em>
Answer:
-13.562%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Net operating profit margin (NOPM) = 11.4%
Net operating asset turnover (NOAT) = 3.83
Return on equity = 30.1%
Adjusted return on assets = 17.1%
Now,
Return on equity = Nonoperating Return + Return in net operating assets
or
Nonoperating Return = Return on equity - Return in net operating assets
Also,
Return in net operating assets = NOAT × NOPM
or
= 3.83 × 11.4%
= 43.66%
therefore,
Nonoperating Return = 30.1% - 43.66%
= 30.1% - 43.662%
= -13.562%
Considering the situation described above, the alternative view about why it may make sense to tolerate the existence of some monopoly firms is that "Monopolies do reduce consumers surplus by producing less and charging more than the outcomes that would occur in a competitive market, but at times it makes sense to sacrifice some efficiency.
This can be illustrated in a situation whereby certain goods or services may not be available except through the chance of earning monopoly profits. This occurs whereby a patent ensures there are incentives for research and development.
In some other cases, it is more ideal if good is produced by a monopolist rather than by multiple producers due to the large fixed costs in production; thereby, with more profits, the price of products would reduce in the long run.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are situations whereby Monopoly is necessary to provide goods and services for the people in a society.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13276400
Answer:
B. The value of a perpetuity is equal to the sum of the present value of its expected future cash flows.
C. The current value of a perpetuity is based more on the discounted value of its nearer (in time) cash flows and less by the discounted value of its more distant (in the future) cash flows.
Explanation:
A Perpetuity is a financial instrument that pays the holder forever or in perpetuity. For example, a bank paying you $800 per year for ever because you invested $40,000.
There are certain characteristics
Option B
The Perpetuity like most financial Securities has its value based on the underlying cashflows that it can accumulate. This means that it's value is based on the present value of it's future cashflow so the other the cash payments, the higher the present value.
Option C.
As the discounted cashflows in the nearer future will be discounted less by the discount rate as opposed to the cash flows further in future, the cashflows nearer to the present in time will contribute more to the Perpetuity than the cashflows further in time.
For example using that first example, $800 per year at a rate of 5% will be discounted to $762 in the first year but in year 10 will be discounted to $491.
Answer:
Interest = $75.90
Principal = $347.64
Explanation:
First find the payment that is required per month. It will be an Annuity payment as the present value of the loan is given.
The loan is for 5 years compounded monthly so period is;
= 5 years * 12 months
= 60
Interest = 4/12
Present Value of Annuity= Payment * (1 - (1 + r) ^ -n)/r
23,000 = Payment * (1 - ( 1 + 4/12%) ^ -⁶⁰)/ 4/12%
23,000 = Payment * 54.304
Payment = 23,000/54.304
= $423.54
Interest Payment is;
= 4/12% * 23,000
= $75.90
Amount going towards Principal;
= 423.54 - 75.90
= $347.64