1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Travka [436]
3 years ago
5

Why were the American archaeologists of the first half of the twentieth century primarily interested in culture history? What’s

meant by a historical explanation of events? How is this different from a scientific explanation, or is it? What was Hannah’s point when she quotes Indiana Jones:"If you want the truth, try the Philosophy Department."?
Social Studies
1 answer:
garri49 [273]3 years ago
7 0

Explanation:

The kind of archaeology that was practiced mainly by the American archaeologist in the early to mid-twentieth century is to explore the culture history. The culture history "explains" the differences or the changes over time in the frequencies of the artifacts by postulating the diffusion of several ideas between the nearby cultures or the migration of the people who had different beliefs and mental templates for the artifact styles.

It is different from scientific explanation as scientific explanation of new archaeology needs to be more  scientific and more anthropological. All the hypothesis should be tested.

Hannah meant by saying that to know the truth we should look at the Philosophy Department is that you will get all your answer to the question in the philosophy department.

You might be interested in
Why might increased anger about the corruption in government lead to less interest in government attempts to reconstruct the sou
vfiekz [6]
<span>Well, they were angry over the Civil War, and some people in the north thought that the entire south should be punished, because of the war. There were also the carpetbaggers who came to the south to try and profit from the destruction and mayhem, and generally being a nuisance to those trying to rebuild destroyed communities. An important role was played also by missionaries who were coming to the south to try and help them rebuild, of which both made the southerners angry because they just wanted to be left alone after their defeat to lick their wounds, try and rebuild, and get life back to normal.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Should original intent be the most important criterion in supreme court decisions, or should other aspects be of equal or greate
Nostrana [21]
Do both of your questions relate to the same thing if so i will be happy to help 
5 0
3 years ago
Which event of 1400s would forever change the way of life of native americans
Anon25 [30]

Answer:

Correct answer is a: Europeans arrived in the America .

Explanation:

A is the correct answer as in 1492 Christopher Columbo with his three ships arrived in the New World. From that period on Europeans started colonizing this area, which forever changed the history of this area. Some Native tribes even disappeared due to this fact.

All other answers are false, as they are not based on historical facts.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ures to solve it.
r-ruslan [8.4K]
A- You will smell bad,have bad lungs,but the smell of smoke is nice
B- You get drunk and maybe die out of instant
D-(For Tony Lopez) JAIL ❤️
E- Bullying, Cyberbullying, Cybercrime, Cybersex, (Ext.)
C- the emigration of highly trained or intelligent people from particular country
F- You drown
8 0
3 years ago
Kant says that when trying to decide whether an action is morally permissible, we must ask if we can consistently will that the
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

<u><em>A universal law</em></u>.

Kant says that when trying to decide whether an action is morally permissible, we must ask if we can consistently will that the maxim of our action should become <u><em>a universal law.</em></u>

Explanation:

The moral concept in Kant drives from the idea of the universal law. According to him, humans must consider if their actions are good or bad if implies and are toward the world. If it is good for the world, it is morally acceptable. On the contrary, just forget. It's pretty simple on the surface, but when we analyze deeply we can see that moral is a complicated concept that is not easy to measure.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where did many modern ideas about law originally come from? (3 points)
    8·2 answers
  • Each of the following is characteristic of special districts, EXCEPT:
    10·1 answer
  • How does the federal government affect me daily?​
    8·1 answer
  • SOCIAL STUDIES HELP ASAP PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • nformation from various sources may be used when writing a laboratory report. Which of these sources must be cited in the Refere
    14·1 answer
  • Scott believes very strongly that saccharine is an unsafe sugar substitute that may even cause cancer. Even though Scott is diab
    7·1 answer
  • Sociologist william julius wilson argues that race is declining in significance as which of the following becomes more important
    13·1 answer
  • Sintist thank this region may have once been a large sea
    14·1 answer
  • Which states were divided in their support of Jackson and Adams? Explain.
    10·1 answer
  • What is nepal famous for?​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!