the correct answer is comparative
Since the <em>Romantic </em>literature had set as its goal the "victory" or predominance of Man over Nature, its language tended to be somewhat triumphalistic (some would say hyperbolic) when it was about how human beings were deployed. Romanticism introduced an long-term project at a time when important scientific milestones were achieved, and also when most of modern nations and States were being founded, thus taking a voice which was very proud of national virtues, some of them legendary, part of folklore or popular culture (but belonging to a national heritage rather than coming from a more traditional stem). Neoclassicist literature was a new take on the Greek-Roman Classics, intending to bring them back into the mainstream and most of the times not fulfilling the feat. Based on this, Neoclassicist language could be felt as overblown. In a way, Romanticism was a look into the future (let us think of <em>Frankenstein </em>a very experimental novel for its time) whereas Neoclasicism very much represented a reaction to such future.
Answer:
Small children often understand nature, animals, and feelings better than an adult who may be used to receiving criticism and back talk. A sixth grader is more sensitive to these words. They can better help each other, rather than seeking an adult for help.
The missing word is <u>Idle. </u>(Option B). That is, The High Line became Idle. This can be inferred form the third to the last sentence.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
An inference is a conclusion that is reached based on the facts that the reader analyses from the text.
An inference must follow a rational process and must be logical.
Please see more about inference at:
brainly.com/question/3390566
#SPJ1
