1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tino4ka555 [31]
3 years ago
5

How did the Georgia legislature respond to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Brown vs. Board of Education?

History
1 answer:
GenaCL600 [577]3 years ago
4 0

Georgia’s legislature enforced the decision of the Supreme Court’s, acknowledging that federal law took priority.

Explanation:

A Supreme Court case declared segregated schools are against their constitution. The rule separate but equal was no longer valid after this. The General assembly in Georgia opposed to this ruling and declared it null and void.

After this, all the public schools who decided to segregate were closed in Georgia and also the funding was stopped. The National flag was changed and several other steps were taken to show resistance against the new enforcement.

You might be interested in
What is the purpose of the system of checks and balances?​
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

the system of checks and balances is intended to make sure that no branch or department of the federal government is allowed to exceed its bounds, guard against fraud

Explanation:

and allow for the timely correction of errors or omissions.

8 0
3 years ago
30 points Please do it right.
tatiyna
87 years ago, the Founding Fathers created a brand new country here based on the idea that everyone is equal. Now, we are at war with ourselves, and this war is testing whether that kind of country can survive. A battle of this war was fought right here where we are standing. We are here today to dedicate a part of this battlefield as a cemetery for the soldiers that died here. This is the right thing to do. There is no way that we can ever bless this ground today more than the soldiers that died here already have. We can’t even come close. No one is going to care or remember the words we say here, but no one can ever forget what those soldiers did here. It’s up to the rest of us that are still alive to dedicate ourselves to finishing what these soldiers have started. It’s up to us to dedicate ourselves to saving the country, and remind ourselves that people have died for this cause. We have to promise that the soldiers here did not die for nothing. We have to promise that this country, under God, will be free again. We have to promise that a country that is made up of the people, was created by the people, and made to serve the people can exist in this world.
6 0
2 years ago
Who are the last president of Brasil​
Gnom [1K]

Explanation:

Jair Bolsonaro is the last president

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the introduction of animals in the Colombian exchange affect many Native American cultures
serious [3.7K]

Answer: Horses. Riding on horses in battle or just finding a place to settle would have been much easier than walking. So, the were helpful in battle and they were helpful to nomads.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What effects did the construction of the transcontinental railroad have on coast-to-coast communication? It made coast-to-coast
Sav [38]
<span>It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about 180 days to about a week. This question is mildly ambiguous due to the word "communication". Does it mean "Speed of sending a message?" or "Speed of moving a physical object?" Given the available options as answers, I will assume the meaning is "Speed of moving a physical object?" With that in mind, let's look at the available options and see what makes sense. It made coast-to-coast communication instantaneous. * Even modern jets can't travel from coast to coast instantaneously, so you wouldn't expect a train to do so either. So this choice is just plain silly and therefore wrong. It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about a week to about a day. * A stagecoach had an average speed of about 5 mph and covered 60 to 70 miles per day. So it's not going to go from coast to coast in only a week. And since that part of the answer is wrong, this choice is wrong. It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about 180 days to about a week. * The 180 day estimate is definitely doable. That's an average speed of about 17 miles per day which is a good speed for a person walking day to day. And that would be about 400 miles per day for the train. The numbers make sense and this is the correct answer. It made coast-to-coast communication more complicated. * Let's see. Buy a train ticket and possibly arrange for 6 layovers. Or plan a multiple month trip and possibly coordinate that effort without having any rapid means of communications? This option is just plain silly when you consider the logistics of traveling for several months vs traveling for a mere week. So this is a bad choice.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the role of west coast newspapers provoking fear of Japanese people in the 1940s?
    10·1 answer
  • Which industry was the top priority for New England settlers during the early colonial era?
    10·2 answers
  • What effects did the arrival of Europeans have on Native Americans? (1 point)
    11·2 answers
  • How can a country’s inflation rate influence the contractual payment policy?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the
    14·1 answer
  • 6. What breakfast starch is considered a staple in the American south?​
    10·1 answer
  • EXERCISE 2
    12·1 answer
  • Who led the Chinese in the construction of the great Wall of China​
    14·1 answer
  • I WILL MARK BRANLIST AND 25 POINTS MORE
    11·1 answer
  • What was the Haudenosaunee League and which regional group could it be found?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!