Answer:
The Whigs.
Explanation:
I just studied about this actually.
Answer:
Probably A.
Explanation:
The Articles did not have separation of powers. It could possibly be B, because the constitution let the federal government tax whereas the the Articles would not also the articles let the states trade internationally, whereas the constitution gave the federal government the control over international trade. But I personally am leaning towards A.
The feature is the rule of law. Unlike people, legislature cannot be affected by passion and if law rules then everyone is equal in the eyes of law. If a man rules and has absolute power, they can be affected by various things that might make them abuse their power, and law cannot abuse power on its own.
According to other social contract theorists, when the government fails to secure their natural rights or satisfy the best interests of society<span>, citizens can withdraw their obligation to obey, or change the leadership through elections.</span>
