Answer: A
Explanation: Hope its right
Answer:
You need to make a petition and have a certain amount of people to sign it, (let´s say you need/want 25,000 people to sign it to stop animal abuse, and have no more kill shelters, and stop lab testing on domestic animals.) i know that it´s very specific. Then you can go to the city´s courthouse, give them the official petition document, and ask the judge to give this to whoever is in charge of the city/state. Then you need to keep calling and write a letter to the white house/whoever is in charge to ask them to make a change in what you want them to change, i´m not a good person at explaining things, but i am speaking from my experience.
The correct option is option D ("Read the results section before you read the discussion section").
Taking a look at the results before you read the discussion section will allow you to form your own interpretation after analysing the content of the article <u>without being biased by what the author's conclusion was in light of the results</u>.
Here's my interpretatin of why the other options are wrong:
A) You should always start with the introduction and never with the abstract. <u>If you first read the abstract, you run the risk of becoming biased towards the author's perspective from the get go</u>.
B) & C) The discussion and conclusion sections should always be the last thing you read. <u>You need to understand the whole article by yourself and generate your own interpretation to be able to contrast it with the author's conclusion and other points of view expressed in the discussion</u>.
Hope this helps!
The answer is to your question is (yes)
