Oh I created a poem like this as well here use mine if you want sorry for the messy writing but up to you if you decide to use it. Hope this helps
Topic: Decision on traveling to Mars
Source 1: Alexander Fisher
Evidence 1: "Mars is the most likely planet for us to colonize"
Evidence 2: "The technology we would need to develop to send humans to Mars would directly benefit our economy here on Earth."
Evidence 3: "Studies have shown that radiation levels on Mars are not lethal to humans. Sure, we would have to live in a dome at first, but over time, we could use science to change the atmosphere and make it possible to go outside, just like on Earth!"
Source 2: Juniper Springs
Evidence 1: "...it is too dangerous. The atmosphere of the planet is more carbon dioxide than oxygen, and it’s very cold.
Evidence 2: "Also, going to Mars would be very expensive."
Evidence 3: "that does not mean they aren't dangerous." "It is foolish to think a dome would be able to protect us from all of the radiation."
Answer:
- Tone (the authors attitude)
- Purpose (reason for writing)
- Style (their word choice, etc)
- Audience (who's reading/intended to)
Explanation:
Environmental philosophy examines our relation, as human beings, to nature or our natural environment: it reviews our philosophical understandings of nature and our conception of nature's value and entitlements; it explores how we are to live with and in nature and to what degree nature is or is not implicated in our own human identity.
