It makes sense; but there are two phrases there that could be divided to make the sentence flow better.
“I am not happy with myself, nor will I ever be.”
Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
The answer is threatening (I got it correct on the test)
I would start it off on what you will be talking about. For example, you could begin with what books and ebooks are both used for.
In the first body paragraph, you explain one reason why you believe ebooks are more useful. In the second paragraph, explain why other people may disagree, and then emphasize on why you think differently.
In a few more paragraphs, list more reasons that support your point of view and do your best to persuade the audience to agree with you. Hope this helps!
