Answer:136 months
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
True, the scores are not valid.
Step-by-step explanation:
The test supposed to be measuring intelligence. We can assume that the intelligence of most people relatively stable (will not change too much over a short amount of time), and can expect it should go upward with brain growth and education. But the test seems to give a huge decrease from the first and second results. Then the third result is a huge increase that even higher than the first test.
We don't know the true value of the subject, but seeing the huge gap for every repetition we can tell that the test result lacks precision.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that confidence level is 95% and sample mean is within 10 minutes of the population mean. i.e. margin of error = 10
Std deviation of population= 211 minutes
Margin of error = Z critical * std error
Std error = sigma/sq rt n = 
Hence we have
\frac{211}{\sqrt{n} }
The minimum sample size is 1710
a) There may not be 1,809 computer users to survey
Answer:
84%
Step-by-step explanation:
The empirical rule tells you that 68% of the standard normal distribution is within 1 standard deviation of the mean. The distribution is symmetrical, so the amount in the lower tail is (1 -68%)/2 = 16%.
Since the number you're interested in, 240, is one standard deviation above the mean (200 +40), the percentage of interest is the sum of the area of the central part of the distribution along with the lower tail:
68% + 16% = 84%.
Answer:
72
Step-by-step explanation:
brainliest please