No. It was an idea that yielded common positive results. “Not a good theory” is biased terminology. New technology can yield new information, but it does not mean that it was not a good theory.
Fish,hawk,sparrow and heron
(B) 25% GG, 50% Gg, and 25% gg
<u>Explanation:</u>
Given:
Green is dominant and is coded by G
Albino is recessive and is coded by g
Two corn plants that are heterozygous for color are crossed.
The heterozygous condition of the plant would be Gg.
The cross is shown in the table attached.
According to the punnett square drawn,
The genotypic ratio is 1 : 2 : 1 (GG : Gg : gg)
= 25% GG , 50% Gg , 25% gg
Phenotypic ratio = 3 : 1 ( green : albino)
= 75% green, 25% albino