Answer:
a) comparative advertising
Explanation:
The given scenario exemplifies Comparative Advertising. It is a marketing strategy in which a product or service of a particular company is presented as superior when compared to a competitor's in terms of price, quality, etc. It may involve printing a side-by-side comparison of the features of a company's products next to those of its competitor as here Olivia listed the prices of various services that she offered as well as the prices charged by two other salons in the area for the same services.
The correct option is (c) no legal barriers prevent a firm from entering an industry.
No legal barriers:
Non-legal writing non-legal careers anything unrelated to the law or the legal profession.
Because, the industry is free and flexible for enter and exit and no other government interventions will be applicable in that free entry no barriers is there and movability will be
for any industry.
Not option (a) Because, the government really levies admission fees for certain types of businesses due to the legal issues surrounding certain businesses and fields, hence they never reimburse the fees.
Not option (b) because, Because it is a government supported program and private businesses cannot participate for free, only semi-government or completely government can do the same, government financed research never helps in sustaining in lower cost patients and hurdles.
Not option (c) because, If a company is operating a successful and reliable business, its marginal cost cannot be zero, and thus will normally not provide free entrance into any industry or type of business.
Learn more about No legal barriers here brainly.com/question/12513296+
#SPJ4
Answer:
Letter a. is correct. <u>TRUE.</u>
Explanation:
This statement is correct because a supply chain is part of the macroenvironment, and operational risk can be defined as different results than expected due to internal or external events.
The current economic scenario appears to be unstable, as political, economic, technological, social and other changes are occurring all the time, which can represent significant external risks in a supply chain, where there is no control by the buyer or supplier.
Some examples of uncontrollable operational risks are:
- Fraud and misconduct;
- Systemic failure;
- Safety;
- Human error.
For this reason, the importance of risk management, which includes planning, identification, qualitative and quantitative analysis, response planning and monitoring and control processes, which together will provide subsidies for less vulnerability in the supply chain and less risk.
Answer:
$102 million and 6.25%
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. For net income
As we know that
Net income = (Earning before interest and taxes - interest) × (1 - tax rate)
where,
EBIT is calculated after finding out the sales, operating cost which is given below:
Sales = $700 million × 1.20 = $840 million
And, the operating costs = 75% × $840 million = $630 million
So, the EBIT is
= $840 million - $630 million
= $210 million
Now the net income is
= ($210 million - $40 million) × (1 - 40%)
= $102 million
2. Now expected growth rate in net income is
= (Latest year Net income ÷ previous year net income) - 1
= ($102 million ÷ $96 million) -1
= 6.25%
Since dividend payout ratio is same so the growth rate in dividend should be equal to the growth rate in net income i.e 6.25%
Because of its highly efficient and low-cost distribution system, walmart has a <u>"Sustainable competitive" </u>advantage over kmart.
Sustainable competitive advantages are required for an organization to flourish in todays worldwide condition. Value investors look for organizations that are deals. Keeping in mind the end goal to abstain from acquiring an esteem trap one of the variables we scan for is sustainable competitive advantages.
Without at least one sustainable competitive advantages an organization will most likely be unable to recoup from whatever made the stock turn into a deal. We just need to purchase the loads of organizations that are genuine esteem ventures, not esteem traps. As it were, we need to purchase stocks exchanging beneath their inborn esteem and will develop income for investors.