1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kobusy [5.1K]
3 years ago
11

The formation of NATO and the Warsaw Pact were similar in that they

History
1 answer:
defon3 years ago
7 0
The formation of NATO and the Warsaw Pact were similar in that they ("<span>B) called for collective security against outside threats," since this was during the Cold War, with NATO being an alliance of western, mostly capitalist states, and the Warsaw Pact representing the Soviet Sphere in the East. </span>
You might be interested in
In the RIDD+ format, answer the following
vampirchik [111]

ssssssssssssssssss

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Rome was able to create and maintain its empire because it had a
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

The Romans had the best army force so that they governed by force. they also had strict laws and government.

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what countries made a deal with each other not to fight one another before WW2? What was this called?
alexandr402 [8]

On August 23, 1939–shortly before World War II (1939-45) broke out in Europe–enemies Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union surprised the world by signing the German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact, in which the two countries agreed to take no military action against each other for the next 10 years.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
4 years ago
9. What has been the greatest advantage of creating groups like the EEC, EU, and NAFTA?
mr_godi [17]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

What has been the greatest advantage of creating groups like the EEC, EU, and NAFTA?

The greatest advantage of creating groups like the EEC, EU, and NAFTA is that countries can form trade regions or trade "blocks" that benefit their economic interests. These trade agreements allow their members to freely trade with no or minimum tax barriers, benefiting their exportations and importations rate.

Let's put the example of NAFTA.

On December 17, 1992, Presidents of Mexico, the United States, and Canada signed NAFTA. They were Carlos Salinas, George H. W. Bush, and Brian Mulroney. This would be the largest free trade area in the world. The entering President, Bill Clinton, supported NAFTA principles but wanted the addition of some clauses on environment protection and better labor agreements. According to President Clinton, a result of the North America Free Agreement (NAFTA) would be increased jobs and lower prices.

NAFTA has been recently renegotiated by the three countries and the new agreement is called USMCA, United States, Mexico, and Canada Agreement.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In world war 1 this was line of fighting that stretched form Belgium southward through most of France
    5·2 answers
  • The term “far east” would have been used to describe which country? canada china egypt russia
    9·1 answer
  • What state do you not have to register to vote?
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with linear functions .
    6·1 answer
  • Which ideas of the Enlightenment do you feel are present in today’s United States of America? Which do you feel are missing?
    9·1 answer
  • Whose unexpected reaction after one of George Whitefield's sermons demonstrated how powerful Whitefield's preaching style was?
    12·1 answer
  • Is the church powerful?
    12·1 answer
  • There was one problem that Congress couldn't agree on in Jefferson Declaration of Independence. What was it?
    7·1 answer
  • Standing your ground is primarily about protecting an individual from criminals chargers. What the correct answer question true
    9·1 answer
  • The statements below are from a historical document.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!