No I don't think so because his or her peers could "cheat" meaning that they could lie and get him out of trouble. Another reason why they shouldn't is because if some of his or her peers didn't like he or she they could make it so that he or she would for sure get in trouble.
Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
Answer:
I dont understand that question
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is c) Inflexible and enduring behavior patterns that impair social functioning
Explanation:
Personality disorders are observed in individuals with persistent maladaptive behavioral patterns that affect different areas in their life. These disorders are divided into different types, including schizoid, paranoid, antisocial, histrionic disorder, among others.
The antisocial disorder is characterized in people who do not usually respect the authority, are manipulative, and are frequently exposed in dangerous situations (robberies and fights); also an individual with this disorder does not feel guilty for their actions. All of these behavioral patterns result in a decrease in a person's social functioning.
<em>I hope this information can help you. </em>
Answer:
The correct answer is option 1. a stimulus in the presence of which a response will be reinforced
Explanation:
We call discriminative stimuli to those stimuli that indicate the probability that a given response is reinforced. The presence of a discriminative stimulus makes the appearance of the responses that have been reinforced in their presence more likely.
It's a neutral stimulus that indicates when the response may or may not lead to the desired consequence. That is, the discriminative stimulus indicates whether the enhancer is available.
