Answer and Explanation:
The quantity theory of money talks about money supply and price level, and their relationship with one another.
In any given economy, the quantity Theory of money states that money supply and price level are directly proportional. This is to say that when there is a change such as an increase in money supply, there would also be a proportional increase in price Ievel. Also when there is an increase in price level, there would also be a proportional increase in money supply.
Answer:
1. Trade off
2. Opportunity cost
3. Cost-benefit analysis
4. Diminishing marginal utility
Explanation:
1. Giving up one benefit or advantage to gain another regarded as more favorable is called trade-off. Every economic decision involves some trade-off.
2. Opportunity cost is the second-best alternative or value of the alternative, that must be given up when making a choice. Because of scarce resources with alternative uses allocation of resources involves some opportunity cost.
3. Cost-benefit analysis can be defined as the process of examining the benefits and costs of each available alternative in arriving at a decision. Resources are allocated efficiently if the cost incurred and benefit earned is equal.
4. As we go on increasing the quantity consumed of a product, the marginal utility or satisfaction earned from its consumption goes on decreasing. This is called diminishing marginal utility.
Answer:
I believe it would be a lot easier to argue organization's ethical responsibility to help employees deal with stress.
<u>Here's some ideas:</u>
<em>INTRO</em>
--> Introduce your topic/argument
(make sure to include a thesis statement!!)
First, show the reader how damaging stress can be to the employee by explaining it's negative impact on the employee's wellbeing:
- Symptoms of stress and ways that it negatively impacts employees specifically.
- Mention how stress reduces productivity and site research about it.
Point out how common stress is within the workplace by using stats or current day examples:
- Statistics about the huge percentage of people who report feeling stressed out from work.
- Use the current day example of how the current pandemic has had a massive impact on the stress especially on healthcare workers.
- Main point: <em>stress is a very common and serious problem among employees</em>.
<em>BODY</em>
Argue how organizations DO have an ethical responsibility to help employees deal with stress:
- Point out how it's a very serious problem.
- Argue that an organization who chooses not to help is a bad organization.
- Show examples in history where organizations did not take good care of their employees.
To further strengthen your argument, mention how beneficial it is for the organization itself to provide resources for employees to help them manage their stress:
- Provide statistics on the usefulness of stress-management programs within the workplaces (example: INCREASES PRODUCTION).
- Argue how happier employees also tend to function better in the workplace because they feel supported.
<em>CONCLUSION</em>
--> Summarize your essay
- Summarize your main points and restate your thesis statement here.
Answer:
option (A) $212.97
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Gross earnings for the pay period ending 10/15/16 = $5,835
Total gross earnings as of 9/30/16 = $104,400
Social Security tax rate = 6.2%
Now,
Total earnings
= Gross earnings for the pay period ending 10/15/16 + Total gross earnings as of 9/30/16
= $5,835 + $104,400
= $110,235
since,The Social Security taxes are on a maximum earnings of $106,800 per year
therefore,
Sabrina's Social Security withheld from her 10/15/16 paycheck will be
= ( Total earnings - $106,800 ) × Social Security tax rate
= ( $110,235 - $106,800 ) × 0.062
= $3,435 × 0.062
= $212.97
Hence,
The answer is option (A) $212.97
Answer: A. dialectic method
Explanation:
The DIALECTIC METHOD or DIALECTICS at it's basic level is a sort of debate between people of opposing viewpoints who wish to use the debate to come up with the best viewpoint by stating the facts and truths of their viewpoints.
They speak on whatever misgivings they may have about the other and explain in a logical manner why their views are better.
It is 'sort' of like a debate because unlike debates, it isn't supposed to get emotional but be fact and merit based.
