Answer:
The answer is: Rose will be taxed as receiving a $15,000 dividend distribution.
Explanation:
Since Parent Corporation owns 70% of Child Corporation, for tax purposes they are considered as one single firm. Rose is the main stockholder of Parent Co. so for tax purposes she is also a stockholder in Child Co. When Child Co. gives her $15,000 in exchange for Parent Co. stock, this would be considered as a dividend distribution rather a stock sale.
Savings accounts . . .
interest rates are most determined by the state of
the national economy.
Mutual funds . . .
Treasury bills . . .
traded on nationwide exchanges; prices and returns
are pretty uniform nationwide.
Real estate . . .
rests directly on local conditions in each city, and sometimes even in
different parts of the same city;
affected by things like local unemployment, local bad weather,
local price of gas, local tourism, local special events, etc.
Answer:
Balance of Stockholder's Equity at December 31 is $1,910,000.
Explanation:
This will appear as follows
Idaho Company
<u>Details $ </u>
Stockholder's Equity:
Common Stock 525,000
Preferred Stock 500,000
Additional Paid-In Cap. - Common Stock 625,000
Additional Paid-In Cap. - Preferred Stock 50,000
Treasury Stock (40,000
)
Retained Earnings <u> 250,000 </u>
Balance at December 31 <u> 1,910,000 </u>
Answer:
matrix organizational structure
Explanation:
When a company works under a matrix organizational structure, specialists from different parts of the organization are brought together on a temporary basis to work on specific projects. It is common for employees to report to both a functional manager (traditional manager) and a product manager (project manager).
Answer:
The correct answer is D. will result in a multiple times higher decrease in equilibrium real GDP in the short run; however, a tax-rate reduction will increase the automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax system, so equilibrium real GDP would be less stable.
Explanation:
Ricardian Equivalence is an economic theory that suggests that when a government increases expenses financed with debt to try to stimulate demand, demand does not really undergo any change.
This is because increases in the public deficit will lead to higher taxes in the future. To keep their consumption pattern stable, taxpayers will reduce consumption and increase their savings in order to offset the cost of this future tax increase.
If taxpayers reduce their consumption and increase their savings by the same amount as the debt to be returned by the government, there is no effect on aggregate demand.
The fundamental concept of Ricardian equivalence is that it does not matter which method the government chooses to increase spending, whether by issuing public debt or through taxes (applying an expansive fiscal policy), the result will be the same and demand will remain unchanged.
