Inductive reasoning is used to draw conclusions and is the opposite of deductive reasoning.
<h3>What is Inductive Reasoning?</h3>
This refers to the method that makes use of the specific details to the general ones in order to draw a conclusion.
Hence, we can see that your question is incomplete because you did not include the text, so a general overview was given to you to help you better understand the concept.
Read more about inductive reasoning here:
brainly.com/question/860494
#SPJ1
Explanation:
You can write a good rebuttal by addressing the other side's argument and then write your counterclaim.
Ex:
Thesis: Banning SeaLand is necessary because of its unethical treatment of animals.
Many SeaLand proponents believe that the theme park benefits animals because it provides millions of dollars to wildlife foundations. However, what they don’t tell the public is that these wildlife foundations are actually organizations that funnel the money back into SeaLand—so actually, SeaLand appears to be donating charity, but it is actually simply donating to itself.
The correct answer is A. She should paraphrase it, because its exact wording is not creative or unique.
In research papers, quotations should be used very sparingly, and only used when a source contains a creative or unique point that can add a nice touch if added to a research paper. The sentence, "Romeo and Juliet seems to be the most popular of Shakespeare's plays" is neither creative nor unique, which is why Catie is better off paraphrasing it in her report rather than directly quoting it.
