Answer:
A Price: Remain constant, Level of Output: Remain constant, Profits: Increase
Explanation:
The image attached shows the different possible solutions. Options can be eliminated based on the problem statement. First, Options B, C and D can be discounted because of the change in output levels. From the information available, the technological innovation lowers marginal cost and cost of production, however it does not affect production time or output levels.
For the two remaining options, A and E, both are possible scenarios based on the information available.
Option E:
Price decreases, output level remains the same and profit remains the same. While this is a possible outcome, as the business is a monopoly, there is no incentive for the monopolist to reduce prices along with cost as they are already the only player in the market. Especially when the reduction in price does not result in increased profit.
Option A:
Price and output level remain constant, while profit increases. This is the most likely outcome as the business is a monopoly. The owner can take advantage of the reduced costs and sell at the same price to increase profits.
Four Muddy Paws uses the concept of<u> "speed-to-market"</u> to maintain it competitive lead.
The term "Speed to market" alludes to the measure of time it takes for an association to dispatch an item or administrations and make it accessible to the client. It represents time taken by the association to take a shot at the item or administration from Idea, Design, Prototype, Test, Develop, Manufacture and dispatch for the end clients.
Answer: The National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign launched the “Above the Influence” (ATI) ad campaign in 2005. The campaign aims to provide young people with a different perspective on life. The campaign’s primary initiative is to reduce drug abuse among teenagers, not just by telling them about the harmful effects of drugs, but by helping them to counter bad influences (such as peer pressure) and believe in themselves. This campaign used print media, the Internet, television, and radio to communicate its message to teenagers.
The primary effects of this ad campaign on the youth in my locality were in terms of the immediate awareness that the ad’s message created. The campaign focused on improving lifestyles rather than just highlighting the bad effects of drugs, so it was able to connect with its target audience. Another key reason for the campaign’s success was the use of multiple media formats to communicate with the target audience.
An important secondary effect of this ad campaign was that it succeeded in spreading awareness about how peer pressure leads people into drug abuse. The campaign’s partnership with schools and other community groups helped to increase its effect on students in their early teens. Another secondary effect of the campaign was a decrease in the long-term use of marijuana and other illicit drugs among teenagers. The campaign managed to foster a feeling of independence and self-assurance among teens over the years.
The message of this ad campaign is still fresh in my mind. I’m sure it had a lasting effect on many others who heard it because it succeeded in building public awareness about the problem of drug abuse and in promoting a positive lifestyle.
Explanation:I got it of edmentum
The type of diversity issue that the case described was <u>E. age</u>.
<h3>What is age discrimination?</h3>
Age discrimination is a diversity issue that involves an employer treating its employees with less favor because of their age.
<h3>Answer Options:</h3>
a. r...
b. opinions and values
c. s.... orientation
d. g.....
e. age
Thus, in the lawsuit that Guido and Rankin brought against the Mount Lemmon fire district, the diversity issue was an age issue.
See the attachment for the complete question and answer options.
Learn more about workplace age discrimination here: brainly.com/question/7239617
Answer:
The correct answer is D
Explanation:
Under the doctrine of the stare decisis, the court will look into the past or the similar issues in order to guide their decisions related to the issues. And the past decisions are referred or acknowledged as the precedent.
Precedent is the principle or rule which is legal and it is established or created by the decision of the court. And this decision become the authority or the example for judging or deciding the similar issues.
Therefore, in this case, the trial court when deciding upon the case of D v E, will likely to allow or permit the minor to cancel the contract or the agreement.
