The colonists thought they were being taxed for problems that they did not create, and in wars that they did not participate in. They thought George III was a tyrant, which he was. Their reasons are clearly laid out in the declaration of Independence. They have (I would say) about 2 dozen grievances and their attitude was enough was enough.
The British fought because their empire was being threatened. They were losing colonies which they thought were rightfully theirs. They came very close (in the beginning) to winning. Maybe George was a little insane, but he was their king and the government flowed from him.
Gostin has defined public health law as “the study of the legal powers and duties of the state to assure the conditions for people to be healthy … and the limitations on the power of the state to constrain the autonomy, privacy, liberty, proprietary, or other legally protected interests of individuals for the protection or promotion of community health.” I guess, you can not protect population without protecting individual. The only way to be successful in protecting each other on a larger scale, nationwide, is to obey the health-related laws on the individual level.
The first amendment protects the citizens right to petition.
The philosopher John Locke was a strong believer in Empiricism, which rests on the assumption that knowledge comes from an individual’s own experience. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Empiricism ?</h3>
Generally, the idea is that all knowledge is generated from sensory experience. Expressed by John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume in the 17th and 18th centuries, it was influenced by the emergence of experimental science.
In conclusion, John Locke was a staunch advocate of Empiricism, which holds that knowledge is derived from personal experience.
Read more about Empiricism
brainly.com/question/21152590
#SPJ1