Ask question

Ask question

All categories

11111nata11111 [884]

3 years ago

7

professor must randomly select 4 students to participate in a mock debate. There are 18 students in his class. In how many diffe

rent ways can these students be selected, if the order of selection does not matter?

1 answer:

Tju [1.3M]3 years ago

5 0

18 divided by 4 gives 4r2 so we could do 32 different ways

You might be interested in

Fernando will divide 0.24 by 4 to help him solve a math problem. Which model below could represent this math problem

balandron [24]

Answer:

So the model should represent either $\frac{6}{100}$ or $\frac{3}{50}$ (its equivalent and simplified form.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Originally the question wants to represent this quotient as tiles.

So, $\frac{\frac{24}{100}}{4} =\frac{24}{100} *\frac{1}{4} =\frac{6}{100}=$

We can still simplify it, but since we're dealing with 100 x 100 squares let's keep it this way

2) So the model should represent either $\frac{6}{100}$ or $\frac{3}{50}$ (its equivalent and simplified form.

6 0

3 years ago

solmaris [256]

The correct answer is C) (5m^50 - 11n^8) (5m^50 + 11n^8)

We can tell this because of the rule regarding factoring the difference of two perfect squares. When we have two squares being multiplied, we can use the following rule.

a^2 - b^2 = (a - b)(a + b)

In this case, or first term is 25m^100. So we can solve that by setting it equal to a^2.

a^2 = 25m^100 -----> take the square root of both sides

a = 5m^50

Then we can do the same for the b term.

b^2 = 121n^16 ----->take the square root of both sides

b = 11n^8

Now we can use both in the equation already given

(a - b)(a + b)

(5m^50 - 11n^16)(5m^50 + 11n^16)

8 0

3 years ago

28 + 56t + 28w equivalent expressions

irina [24]

Answer:

28(1+2t+w)

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

¿Cuántos litros hay en 25 vasos si cada vaso contiene 0,20 litros?

Norma-Jean [14]

Voy a decir que son 5 litros

4 0

3 years ago

In a survey of 2065 adults in a certain country conducted during a period of economic uncertainty, 63 % thought that wages paid

LenKa [72]

Answer:

a) D.The interpretation is flawed. No interval has been provided about the population proportion.

b) D.The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.

c) A.The interpretation is reasonable.

d) C.The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) We are 95 % confident 63 % of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low. Is the interpretation reasonable?

D.The interpretation is flawed. No interval has been provided about the population proportion.

The sample proportion alone will not give us any confidence in estimating the true proportion of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low.

We need a 95% confidence interval to claim that the true proportion is within this interval. In this case, as the margin of error is 4%, the 95% CI is 59% and 67%.

(b) We are 91 % to 99 % confident 63 % of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low. Is the interpretation reasonable?

D.The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.

The confidence is set at a fixed value and from that value the confidence interval is estimated. It still uses the sample proportion instead of the confidence interval to estimate the true proportion.

(c) We are 95 % confident the proportion of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty who believed wages paid to workers in industry were too low was between 0.59 and 0.67. Is the interpretation reasonable?

A.The interpretation is reasonable.

It uses the right sample data and interpret correctly the meaning of the confidence interval.

(d) In 95 % of samples of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty, the proportion who believed wages paid to workers in industry were too low is between 0.59 and 0.67. Is the interpretation reasonable?

C.The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.

This confidence interval is an estimation about the parameter of the population. It doesn't give information to estimate the sampling distribution, as it only has information of one specific sample.

6 0

3 years ago