B french to easy of an answer
Answer:
What Alexander Hamilton meant was that out of the three branches of the government (Executive, Legislature and the Judiciary), the judiciary (Supreme Court) has almost no power to exercise on it's own, thereby making it "the least dangerous branch".
Explanation:
When Hamilton wrote that the supreme court was the least dangerous branch of government, he meant to say that the court has no authority or power to exercise very the other executive or legislature, nor can it act without these two. In short, is is nothing without these two. While these two can do things without it, the same isn't for the judiciary. The judiciary branch is the weakest branch of the government as it has no influence over either "the sword or the purse", without any force or will to exercise it's powers. It's basically an unnecessary need. Yes, what he said is true due to the fact that no laws can be passed without the consent of the other two branches, while things can be done without the knowledge of the judiciary. Courts need the permission of the Executive, the President or the Head of the Country to make any decision.
Answer:
The short answer is yes. The entire point/concept of imprisonment is to rehabilitate the prisoners so they will go back out in the world and be respectful citizens. Criminal rehabilitation is the process of helping inmates grow stronger and change their behavior, allowing them to isolate themselves from the many factors that made them commit a crime in the first place. This causes a majority of them to commit crimes so they can go back to prison where they know how to survive. Studies and research has consistently shown that time spent in prison does not successfully rehabilitate most prisoners/inmates, and most of the criminals return to a life of almost immediately.
Explanation:
Can't explain these type of questions :v
Hope this helped! :)
