Answer:
Supplier's quotation (2,400 x $6.25) 150,000
Less: Relevant cost of production:
Direct material (2,400 x $31) 74,400
Direct labour (2,400 x $18) 43,200
Variable overhead (2,400 x $9) <u>21,600</u> <u>139,200</u>
Savings <u> 10,800</u>
The parts should be produced in-house since the relevant cost of production is lower than supplier's quotation.
Explanation:
In this case, we need to compare supplier's quotation to the relevant cost of production. The price of $6.25 above was computed by dividing the total price charged by the supplier by the number of parts. Moreso, the relevant cost of production is obtained by the aggregate of direct material, direct labour and variable overhead.
Answer:
2030
Explanation:
The computation of the total number of new generators including this year is shown below
Given that
(A) = 100
Common Ratio (r) = 1.15
n = 10
Now
Sum of 10 terms Sn is
= A × (r n - 1) ÷ (r - 1)
= 100 × (1.1510 - 1) ÷ (1.15 - 1)
= 100 × 3.0456 ÷ 0.15
= 2030
We simply applied the above formula so that the total number of new generators could come
Answer:
(B) Nonmoney property distributions made by an S corporation having accumulated E&P are treated differently when determining the corporateminuslevel gain recognized under Sec. 311 than are property distributions made by an S corporation without accumulated E&P.
Explanation:
