Well, perhaps slow down on the celebrity media intake. Stop making them a "star of the show" on the news exposing their private life. Now I know nothing about the South African Press Association President(s) so you will also have to look at the information given to you about what options they might chose.
Then, calm down on companities trying to "steal" information and post it about celebrities with their children out at lunch. Also educate the people to slow down on their intake-which would be seriously hard.
Also, give a PSSA to celebrities on how they can more protect themselves outside and online from people looking for their information.
This is false.
<u>Professional athletes generally love and glorify the sport they practice, however, sport for these people </u><u>is a profession like any other</u><u>. </u>These people become professionals and their livelihood comes from sports activity. This is important to ensure that athletes are dedicated and concerned exclusively with their performance in the sport.
Note: Some sports are well-paid, such as football, basketball, golf and tennis, making their practitioners reach fortunes.
Hernando de Soto, the Spanish conquistador.
Answer:
Explanation:
According to Wikipedia, ***"The rule of four is not required by the Constitution, any law, or even the Supreme Court's own published rules. Rather, it is a custom that has been observed since the Court was given discretion over which appeals to hear by the Judiciary Act of 1891It is a working rule devised by the Court as a practical mode of determining that a case is deserving of review, the theory being that if four Justices find that a legal question of general importance is raised, that is ample proof that the question has such importance. This is a fair enough rule of thumb on the assumption that four Justices find such importance on an individualized screening of the cases sought to be reviewed."***
Rhis modus operandi helps to streamline the quality and amount of appeal that is granted Certiorari by ensuring that only very important question is given consideration.
This would hence discard those questions, scenarios or appeals that does not win the vote of the four justices.
Hence it is a not so favorable procedure to the minority masses holding a claim that seems trivial in the surface.
But this procedure should remain.
And also, camera's should not be prohibited in the court room. This helps to test for objectivity.
