1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garri49 [273]
3 years ago
12

Briefly explain TWO common characteristics that led to the rise and stability of the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires.

History
2 answers:
nekit [7.7K]3 years ago
8 0
<h2>Answer 1 with Explanation</h2>

The two characteristics that led to the rise and stability were that the empires have a great military force that conquered most of their empire’s land and the other was that all of the empires were ruled by absolute monarchs. They were basically featured by unique standards during the early time when tribes had no or less characteristics.

<h2>Answer 2 with Explanation </h2>

Following are the two major characteristics that were the most beneficial are as follows:

1) All of them were gunpowder empires

2) They were also Turkic-speaking tribal groups.

These soldiers were from the specified nations who obtained the latest military technology that appeared to be highly beneficial for the tribe's battles and for maintaining law control power. These three empires wanted to build stronger trade relationship with European nations and wanted to portray themselves as champions of religious harmony.

miv72 [106K]3 years ago
5 0

1) Gunpowder

The Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires rose as great powers and expanded largely during the 16th century due to a great extent to the use of gunpowder weapons. Armies from the three empires acquired this new military technology which resulted very useful for their campaigns and for keeping the power.

2) Strong political leadership

The three empires experienced an era of expansion under the rule of strong emperors: Suleiman the Magnificent in the Ottoman Empire, Shah Abbas I in the Safavid Empire, and Akbar in the Mughal Empire. The three of them carried out political, legal, economic, and military reforms and led their empires during a time of cultural bloom and economic growth.

You might be interested in
I WILL MARK FIRST REAL ANSWER BRAINLIEST!! PLEASE HELP
muminat
3. They did a good job, in my opinion. The reason for this is that at the time, very few civilizations (if any at all) had a large road network that kept the civilization well connected and allowed for "fast" information transport. This was not the case in the Assyrian empire, where local governors were required to maintain roads and road stations at strategic points, allowing for faster communication as a result of improved infrastructure.


4. The Assyrian and Babylonian empires were two kingdoms that coexisted. Their cultures were exactly the same. Everything is the same: language, laws, religion... This culture was either descended from Sumerian and Akkadian societies or entirely created by the Assyrian-Babylonians.
7 0
2 years ago
What describes an action of Caesar augustus
Ilya [14]

Answer:

It's B

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the articles of confederation fail?
GalinKa [24]
It was to broad and gave the state's power allowing people to do what they wanted there was no strong centeral government in order to take lead
gave congress no power to tax so they had no money
provided no common currency

and gave states one vote regardless of size

8 0
3 years ago
Who has the most political power in canada
Alika [10]
<span>A. British Monarch. One of the most fundamental differences between Canadian and American government is that Canada is a constitutional monarchy while the United States is a type of democracy known as a republic. As a constitutional monarchy, ("Canada's head of state is the British monarch"), who is represented in Canada by an official known as the governor general</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What conditions did the Republicans agree to so that the South would accept Hayes as president?
trapecia [35]

Answer:

Hayes, a Republican, became president after a disputed election. ... In return, he agreed to end federal support of radical Republican governments in the South. He promised to name southerners to his cabinet and other important jobs. And he said he would provide more federal aid for schools and railroads in the South.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain some factors that causes shift in supply and demand
    12·1 answer
  • HOW DID THE SPIRITUAL REVIVAL AND EMERGENCE OF REFORMIST SECTS IN THE TWELFTH CENTURY THREATENED THE POWER OF THE CATHOLIC CHURC
    13·1 answer
  • The uprising of loyal Chinese against outsiders was called the: Boxer Rebellion Open-Door Policy Chinese-Japanese Rebellion
    5·1 answer
  • What year did the 7 year war start​
    13·2 answers
  • How were renaissance scholars able to study ancient text
    14·2 answers
  • What was struggle buggies
    8·1 answer
  • The map below shows areas under Muslim control.
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the pilgrims write the mayflower contract
    8·1 answer
  • What is one of the main driving forces behind the creation and expansion of the European Union?
    12·1 answer
  • What effect would El Niño most likely have on organisms?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!