<span>The societies of Paleolithic man were far different then that of the Neolithic man. The Old Stone Age societies had no time for other actives then what was necessary to survive. They did not invent many new things, and were constantly moving and changing their environment. Societies in he New Stone Age were a settled people, who constantly improved their lifestyle’s to make it easier to live by. Job's of the women no longer consisted of gathering, it consisted of growing the crops, since agriculture was a new provider of food. In conclusion, the lives of the people living in the Paleolithic and the Neolithic time period were different in many ways and a like also. Through the improvements in technology, education, and culture they were able to enhance the quality of life throughout these two periods. As man’s mind increased, it led into the new age, and the start of what may be civilization, as we know it.</span>
Answer: Capital
Explanation:
The Second bank of the United States was Alexander Hamilton's second attempt at establishing a National bank that he believed was necessary to ensure stability in the currency and fiscal operations of government.
This bank had more capital than its predecessor as it was 80% owned by four thousand wealthy private individuals who by buying stock in it, gave it the aforementioned capital.
Answer:
D. falling crop prices
Explanation:
The biggest factor that led to the Great Depression was the big drop in the crop prices. The reason why this happened was the bad planning of the agricultural sector and farmers. They managed to produce much more crops then what the domestic market demanded, but also more then what was demanded for export. This led to enormous surplus of crops, so the prices started to drop incredibly low. This created a chain reaction, so the whole economy started to crumble because of it, and in accordance to it, the national currency as well, leading to big inflation.
<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that in general expansion was not justifiable since the Mexicans and Natives were doing nothing to provoke the US. One could argue it was justifiable since Americans needed more land. </span>
<span>Conservative criticism of the equal rights amendment was largely based around the idea that this movement went against the "economic and social Darwinism" of the time--meaning that it was only natural for some people to have fewer rights than others. </span>
