Answer:
Explanation:
He compares the role of a supreme court justice to that of an umpire in baseball or a referee in football or hockey.
He says for example, that those neutrals would never favor a team for person reasons. A team would never get unfair treatment if they were in a do or die match and had not been in such a match for 50 or more years while their opponents had one this match multiple times. Such behavior would be unthinkable.
He stated that one must uphold the rules as given to him. The idea of a referee or umpire falls apart a little here, but a supreme court justice is not obligated to uphold rules which are unconstitutional. His job is to fairly judge what should be decided. It does not matter what his own thoughts on abortion might be: he must rule on what the constitution would say about such matters.
Sometimes it is not always easy.
In<span> his classic ( the original study of obedience, Milgram found that 65% (two-thirds) </span><span> of subjects would shock an innocent person to what they believed was 450 volts.
This study disturbingly concludes that Human will have the tendency to follow an authoritative figure including killing another human being. (all participants know that 450 volts could cause death)</span>
Scientific ideas don't need to be published in an encyclopedia: rather, they need to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Also, public acceptance is not relevant: global warming is accepted in the scientific community despite a lack of popular acceptance.
The correct answer is: They are new ideas. (and once they're accepted they can become laws).
Syria and Iraq are affected by turkey building their dams
It's known as a neighborhood watch
(Sorry, I don't have any sources... I live in a neighborhood in which this tactic is employed, so that's my source, I guess)
