All categories

3 years ago

TRUE or FALSE. There are two means for achieving financial goals—you either need to increase your savings or reduce spending.

Business

2 answers:

Lerok [7]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

TRUE

Explanation:

Having financial goals is important for you to achieve your dreams. If you have a financial goal of saving money, you should lower your cats or increase your savings. If you want to reach your goal faster, you can use these two strategies together.

quester [9]3 years ago

3 0

As the basis for everything about finnancial issues, the statement above is TRUE. These means are the basis to achieve your goals to save money and keep your budget safe. Hope this is good for you

You might be interested in

Nutech Corp. is expecting the following cash flows—$79,000, $112,000, $164,000, $84,000, and $242,000—over the next five years.

Alja [10]

Answer:

$429,560

Explanation:

Present value will be calculated through the PV formula,

$PV = \frac{C1}{1+r} + \frac{C2}{(1+r)^{2} } + \frac{C3}{(1+r)^{3}} + \frac{C4}{(1+r)^{4}} + \frac{C5}{(1+r)^{5}}$

r = 15%

C1 = $79,000 ,C2 = $112,000 ,C3 = $164,000 ,C4 = $84,000 ,C5 = $242,000

Substituting the values in the formula,

$PV = \frac{79,000}{1.15} + \frac{112,000}{(1.15)^{2} } + \frac{164,000}{(1.15)^{3}} + \frac{84,000}{(1.15)^{4}} + \frac{242,000}{(1.15)^{5}}$

PV = 68,695.66 + 84,688 + 107,838 + 48,030.2 + 120,338.14

PV = $429,560

The present value of the cash flows of Nutech Corp. over the next five years is $429,560.

8 0

3 years ago

A machine with a cost of $142,000 and accumulated depreciation of $97,000 is sold for $56,000 cash. The amount that should be re

Temka [501]

A machine would cost $142,000 and the depreciation of $98,000

6 0

3 years ago

Scenario 13-6 Ziva is an organic lettuce farmer, but she also spends part of her day as a professional organizing consultant. As

Tamiku [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is:

$380 (D.)

Explanation:

The cost of production of a good or service is the amount used up or forfeited in the production of the good or service. In this scenario, from Ziva used 10 hours for farming and because she dedicated 10 hours, if she had been available for her consultancy service which paid her $25 per hour, she would have earned a total of $250 at the end of the 10 hours she used in farming. In addition, she also spend $130 on the seed that she used for planting, which is the direct cost of farming (production). Hence the total amount given up in the farming process will make up the total cost of farming, and this includes; the $250 given up for consultancy, and the $130 spent on seeds, hence, the total cost of production is;

= 250 + 130 = $380

6 0

3 years ago

Sandy earned a salary of $50,000 last year. Her parents gave her a car valued at $23,000 for her birthday. In addition, she earn

IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

$51,200

Explanation:

Gross income computation includes all forms of income such as wages, rents, royalties, dividend etc. However, gifts and inheritances are not considered as a part of the gross income.

Therefore, Sandy's gross income consist of her salary, and the interest income

Sandy's Gross income = 50000 + 1200

= $51,200

The inheritance of her grandmother's estate and car gift are not included as a part of Sandy's gross income.

5 0

3 years ago

CIRP. Jason Smith is a foreign exchange trader with Citibank. He notices the following quotes. Spot exchange rate SFr1.6627/$ Si

Zinaida [17]

Answer:

Answer explained below

Explanation:

For six months, rSFr => 1.50% and r$ => 1.75%.

Since the exchange rate is in SFr/$ terms, the appropriate expression for the interest rate parity relation is

F/S => [ (1 + rSFr ) / ( 1 + r$) ]

then we can also say

F/S *( 1 + r$) => (1 + rSFr )

Now Left side => F/S *( 1 + r$) => [ ( 1 + 6.558) / ( + 1.6627) ] * (1 +0.0175)

Left side => 1.0133

and Right side => (1 + rSFr ) => 1.0150

Since the left and right sides are not equal, IRP is not holding.

B and C.

Since IRP is not holding, there is an arbitrage possibility.

As 1.0133 < 1.0150,

we can say that the EuroSFr quote is more than what it should be as per the quotes for the other three variables. And, we can also say that the Euro$ quote is less than what it should be as per the quotes for the other three variables. Therefore, the arbitrage strategy should be based on borrowing in the Euro$ market and lending in the SFr market. The steps are as as follows. -

Borrow $1000000 for six-months at 3.5% per year and then we will pay back

=> $1000000 * (1 + 0.0175) => $1,017,500 six months later.

Convert $1000000 to SFr at the spot rate to get SFr 1662700.

Lend SFr 1662700 for six-months at 3% per year. Will get back

=> SFr1662700 * (1 + 0.0150) => SFr 1,687,641 six months later.

Sell SFr 1687641 six months forward. The transaction will be contracted as of the current date but delivery and settlement will only take place six months later. So, sixmonths later exchange

SFr 1,687,641 for => SFr 1687641 ⁄ SFr 1.6558/$ => $1,019,230.

The arbitrage profit six months later is 1019230 - 1017500 = $1,730

6 0

3 years ago